Parent Categories
Related Products
Related Books
The Men They Knew: Masculinity in the Works of Classic Women Authors
Masculinity in Classics by Women AuthorsWe have all assumed what masculinity is—or at least carried a version of it in our minds. For some, it is dominance, strength, and authority; for others, a role to perform, a privilege to wield, or a burden to bear. These ideas, often rooted in rigid social expectations, have hardened into a form of limitation—where emotional restraint is mistaken for strength and vulnerability is viewed as a weakness.
Classic women authors challenge and unsettle these assumptions. The men they knew were not the products of the patriarchy that women have been taught to expect. They were deeply human figures—flawed, vulnerable, and often constrained by the very standards they are expected to embody. Rather than simply portraying hypermasculine alpha men, these writers questioned them, reshaping masculinity into something complex, fragile, and enduringly relevant.
And this time, we attempt to explore how masculinity appeared through the eyes of different classic women authors—and how such interpretations continue to endure in the modern world.
Victor Frankenstein’s Fragility: How Mary Shelley Unravels Masculine Pride
[Image Credit: Los Angeles Public Library]Masculinity is often intertwined with pride—but where does that pride begin to undo itself? In Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein becomes an answer to that question. Mary Shelley presents a character driven by an intense desire to transcend human limits, embodying a form of typical masculinity rooted in control, intellect, and the relentless pursuit of greatness. Yet, this very pursuit isolates him from the emotional and moral responsibilities that follow.
Victor abandons his creation, suppresses his guilt, and retreats into isolation rather than confronting his failure. In evading accountability, he reveals the fragility beneath his ambition—a masculinity that cannot withstand its own consequences. Through him, Shelley exposes a masculinity that appears powerful, yet remains deeply constrained by its own fear of vulnerability.
Restraint & Moral Growth: Masculinity Through Jane Austen's Lens
In Jane Austen’s world, masculinity is not loud or performative—it is measured, observed, and tested through conduct. Her male characters are not defined by strength or dominance, but by how well they exercise restraint and whether they are capable of moral growth.
Characters like Mr Darcy in Pride and Prejudice embody this tension. His initial pride and emotional distance reflect a masculinity shaped by privilege, yet his true transformation lies in his ability to reflect, change, and act with humility.
[Mr Knightley]Similarly, Mr Knightley in Emma represents a steadier form of masculinity—one rooted in patience, honesty, and quiet guidance rather than control. In contrast, figures such as George Wickham in Pride and Prejudice and John Willoughby in Sense and Sensibility reveal the limits of charm without conscience.
Through these contrasts, Austen suggests that masculinity is not inherent but cultivated. It is revealed not in grand gestures, but in the ability to take responsibility, to respect others, and most importantly, to grow.
Growth, Power & Empathy: How Elizabeth Gaskell Reimagines Masculinity
In North and South, John Thornton reflects how Gaskell constructs masculinity within the pressures of industrial society. She begins with a rigid model—authority, discipline, and control—but gradually unsettles it.
Through narrative contrast and Margaret Hale’s perspective, Gaskell reveals the limits of such masculinity, showing how it isolates and restricts emotional understanding. Thornton’s evolution is intentional: she reshapes masculinity not by rejecting strength, but by tempering it with empathy. For Gaskell, masculinity is not fixed, but something that must grow beyond control into compassion.
Masculinity in the World of the Brontë Sisters: Trapped Between Extremes
[Edward Rochester, Image Credit: BBC]The men the Brontë sisters knew were rarely simple; they were shaped by intensity, contradiction, and emotional unrest. In Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë, Edward Rochester embodies a masculinity rooted in control and secrecy—his authority masking deep vulnerability.
In contrast, St John Rivers represents the other extreme: a cold, disciplined masculinity that suppresses emotion in the name of duty.
Emily Brontë intensifies this tension through Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights, whose masculinity is raw, obsessive, and destructive, where love turns into possession and revenge. Even in the quieter works of Anne Brontë, masculinity remains troubled. Arthur Huntingdon in The Tenant of Wildfell Hall reveals the dangers of indulgent masculinity—where charm masks irresponsibility and moral decay.
Across their works, masculinity is never balanced; it is caught between control and chaos, repression and excess—suggesting that either extreme leads to its own form of ruin.
How Classic Women Writers Saw Men Differently
Women writers made one thing clear: patriarchy and healthy masculinity are not the same. What patriarchy rewards often limits men—binding them to control, silence, and emotional restraint—while healthier forms of masculinity allow space for empathy, vulnerability, and moral awareness. Through the men they created, these writers did not simply reflect society; they questioned it.
From ambition that isolates to pride that must be unlearned, from repression that suffocates to growth that redeems—these portrayals reveal masculinity as something deeply human, yet deeply constrained by expectation. In reimagining men this way, classic women authors did more than critique masculinity—they expanded its possibilities.
Perhaps that is why their work still endures. Because in showing what masculinity has been, they are constantly asking what it could become.
Your next read: Love vs Autonomy: How Women Classic Authors Rewrote Romance